$3,000 THP Freeroll at Pacific
suitedaces84 wrote:kook04,
You were a very small dog preflop and a very small favorite on the flop. It doesn't matter who won the hand. It was not going to be a bad beat or anything resembling a bad beat either way.
You need to go back and read my post(s) again too. Not only didn't I say it was a bad beat, I explicitly said that it wasn't a bad beat. Twice. In light of that, I think that your quote above is pretty uneeded.
- kook04
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 4:59 pm GMT
somebody said their friend got 1st....i'm sure 2nd and 3rd know who they are, hopefully they're watching this topic...i figured geno woulda posted the results, but he got knocked out early...this is the first freeroll i couldn't play in, so i missed it
-

Sid Lambert - Posts: 718
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 2:52 pm GMT
Sid Lambert wrote:i figured geno woulda posted the results, but he got knocked out early...
Thanks for the reminder buddy
I don't even know what position I finished I was so disgusted at losing holding a dominating hand
-

HalfSugar - King Moderator
- Posts: 6228
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:20 pm GMT
- Location: UK
I checked back right when it ended. If I remember correctly first was ZeroOuts (sp?), second claude90 (or something like that). Yeah, a lotta ringers there, seemed to me. I think there should be a minimum post requirement for future THP freerolls... say 390 or so. 
- Iron Butt
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:59 pm GMT
Actually, the notion that a number of posts indicates some level of 'loyalty' or 'value' is rather misguided.
I think we can all think of examples of people with large numbers of posts who don't add value.
If there were a restriction, 1) I don't know how we'd communicate that to the site in question for registration and 2) I'd think it's at least partially a time-based (i.e., from registration date) function. Maybe some mixture of that and number of posts.
That being said, I don't mind the new people coming in, since I don't last long anyway (with one lucky exception).
I think we can all think of examples of people with large numbers of posts who don't add value.
If there were a restriction, 1) I don't know how we'd communicate that to the site in question for registration and 2) I'd think it's at least partially a time-based (i.e., from registration date) function. Maybe some mixture of that and number of posts.
That being said, I don't mind the new people coming in, since I don't last long anyway (with one lucky exception).
-

golddog - Tournament Champion
- Posts: 1324
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 6:18 pm GMT
- Location: Denver, CO
Sorry Gold I don’t think anyone was implying post count is directly proportional to loyalty or value. It’s more of a joke because I’m sure we’d all like to play freerolls with that kind of prize pool and that few entrants.
-

Muck - Posts: 2735
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 12:19 pm GMT
- Location: Newport on Styx
Muck wrote:Sorry Gold I don’t think anyone was implying post count is directly proportional to loyalty or value. It’s more of a joke because I’m sure we’d all like to play freerolls with that kind of prize pool and that few entrants.
Playing them is better then sleeping through them with your face on your keyboard
-

JohnnyCache - Moderator
- Posts: 2544
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 9:03 pm GMT
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

