considering the opponent outs while he ahead?

[soundmun]

Why is it when say I have A9 vs AK , contemplating the opponents 3 outs for a K is irrelevant? why shouldnt I subtract the 3K that will make my 3 outs beat?

[HalfSugar]

Because you need to catch up. His outs are basically everything except a 9 rather than his outs are one of the remaining Kings.

[soundmun]

Because you need to catch up. His outs are basically everything except a 9 rather than his outs are one of the remaining Kings.

yes but in some cases a 9 will come and also a K. so its not only to catch a 9 but to avoid a K...

[xDiamond_CutteRx]

Because you need to catch up. His outs are basically everything except a 9 rather than his outs are one of the remaining Kings.

yes but in some cases a 9 will come and also a K. so its not only to catch a 9 but to avoid a K...

True probability takes that into account, and is part of what we can reverse implied odds. However, for purposes of determining which outs YOU have, it's only relevant which cards will put you ahead of an opponent.

[soundmun]

so in a fact my ODDS is less than the odds of hitting a 9 to the river right? (=less than 30%)

[Jernej Zorec]

that would be called your equity

[soundmun]

So let me grt it right, what is my TRUE odds of WINNING when im dominated? (AK vs AT ex.)

[Jernej Zorec]

27.028%

look for program pokerstove, it will tell u your equity

[soundmun]

so what i need to realy consider is the equity rather than the odds as from the poker calculatior in this site right?