how many times can yuo raise in one round
17 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
how many times can yuo raise in one round
you could potentially go round for ever each each man raises each time ? is there a limit ?
- seanuk
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:37 am GMT
I think there usually is in a Fixed Limit games (known as the cap).
Not in No Limit though.
NB: A player can raise more than once per round if someone else has raised them back. Your post implies you might not have been aware of this.
Not in No Limit though.
NB: A player can raise more than once per round if someone else has raised them back. Your post implies you might not have been aware of this.
-

Muck - Posts: 2735
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 12:19 pm GMT
- Location: Newport on Styx
I'm pretty sure no limit means, no limit. As in, unlimited. The only rules as far as amounts are that you must bet a minimum equal too or more than the previous bet/raise.
-

MasterShake - Posts: 1745
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 8:28 pm GMT
- Location: Somewhere between Caribou and New Haven.
Think about this.
Lets say we're playing on a 1000nl table and players A and C were colluding.
Innocent old B is sitting at the table with a full stack, as are our two villians.
Now lets say there's a juicy river in a 200 buck pot. Our fine friends decide to act drunk and go into a minraise war, with our innocent chump in between. Ofcourse he's never going to fold to a simple 10 dollar raise, so he calls, only to find himself stuck in between. 3 hours later, after the rest of the table has long fallen asleep, our innocent B is 800 poorer, after C shows his nuts and A mucks with a gentle rap of the table, tossing his cards in the middle of the muck.
Woo! Poker is so exciting.
Lets say we're playing on a 1000nl table and players A and C were colluding.
Innocent old B is sitting at the table with a full stack, as are our two villians.
Now lets say there's a juicy river in a 200 buck pot. Our fine friends decide to act drunk and go into a minraise war, with our innocent chump in between. Ofcourse he's never going to fold to a simple 10 dollar raise, so he calls, only to find himself stuck in between. 3 hours later, after the rest of the table has long fallen asleep, our innocent B is 800 poorer, after C shows his nuts and A mucks with a gentle rap of the table, tossing his cards in the middle of the muck.
Woo! Poker is so exciting.
- supafrey
- Posts: 5651
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:42 pm GMT
- Location: Ontario
supafrey wrote:No limit, between two people, is usually capped at 4 raises, i think.
supafrey wrote:Think about this.
<insert irrelevant example involving three players here>
-

Sean_in_NJ - Posts: 3340
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:57 pm GMT
- Location: New jersey
Sean_in_NJ wrote:supafrey wrote:No limit, between two people, is usually capped at 4 raises, i think.supafrey wrote:Think about this.
<insert irrelevant example involving three players here>
Woops. I meant more than 2 people I think. I've definitely heard of this rule but I don't quite remember the wording.
- supafrey
- Posts: 5651
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:42 pm GMT
- Location: Ontario
supafrey wrote:Woops. I meant more than 2 people I think. I've definitely heard of this rule but I don't quite remember the wording.
In multi-way pots, you're absolutely right. The situation probably comes up a lot less in NL than FL, but the purpose of the rule is the same.
-

Sean_in_NJ - Posts: 3340
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:57 pm GMT
- Location: New jersey
I believe the limit terms may vary, even heads-up.
Here in Colorado we only have limited-stakes gambling, and I'm pretty sure that even heads-up it's capped at four.
But I think that's also the exception to the rule. "Normal" places let you go at it heads-up until one guy figures out the wrong end of the full house is no good.
I believe the ruling is something about limiting the amount of money you can lose in one hand. I once played in a tournament up there where (no kidding) the first two hands were limit, then it switched to no-limit for exactly that reason--whatever the buy-in was, they had to spread your loss across at least three hands.
Here in Colorado we only have limited-stakes gambling, and I'm pretty sure that even heads-up it's capped at four.
But I think that's also the exception to the rule. "Normal" places let you go at it heads-up until one guy figures out the wrong end of the full house is no good.
I believe the ruling is something about limiting the amount of money you can lose in one hand. I once played in a tournament up there where (no kidding) the first two hands were limit, then it switched to no-limit for exactly that reason--whatever the buy-in was, they had to spread your loss across at least three hands.
-

golddog - Tournament Champion
- Posts: 1324
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 6:18 pm GMT
- Location: Denver, CO
17 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to Rules and Beginner Questions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

