TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Texas Holdem Strategy, Online Poker Rooms, and Holdem Resources
  • Texas Holdem Strategy
  • Beginner's Intro
  • Calculating Odds & Outs
  • Preflop Strategy
  • When to Bet
  • Cheating
  • Position
  • Bluffing
  • Poker Help
  • Poker Forum
  • Poker Etiquette
  • Player Interviews
  • Texas Holdem Rules
  • How to Host a Game
  • Poker Tools
  • Poker Database
  • Poker Calculators
  • Online Poker Tournies
  • Holdem Odds Chart
  • Poker Articles
  • Poker Terms
  • Links
Footer





Advanced search    

  • Board index ‹ Texas Holdem and Poker Forums ‹ Hand Analysis and Theory
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Middle set on ultra action

Analysis of specific hands and general game theory
Forum rules
Post a reply
25 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

Middle set on ultra action

Postby odlozilik » Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:44 pm GMT

Stage #1039688993: Holdem No Limit $0.50 - 2008-07-30 13:10:41 (ET)

Table: KNIK AVE (Real Money) Seat #8 is the dealer

Seat 8 - ODLOZILIK ($100.55 in chips)
Seat 9 - ORIGINALDAVE ($44.13 in chips)
Seat 1 - GETTINGLARGE ($96.25 in chips)
Seat 2 - TEACHCPS ($42.90 in chips)
Seat 3 - CFASTING ($106.70 in chips)
Seat 4 - SKYEELLA ($115.70 in chips)
Seat 5 - AAMELI ($99.25 in chips)
Seat 6 - JOHN1BASEDOW ($93.03 in chips)
Seat 7 - FIRECLOWN ($19.52 in chips)

ORIGINALDAVE - Posts small blind $0.25
GETTINGLARGE - Posts big blind $0.50

*** POCKET CARDS ***

Dealt to ODLOZILIK [7h 7s]

TEACHCPS - Folds
CFASTING - Calls $0.50
SKYEELLA - Folds
AAMELI - Folds
JOHN1BASEDOW - Folds
FIRECLOWN - Calls $0.50
ODLOZILIK - Calls $0.50
ORIGINALDAVE - Calls $0.25
GETTINGLARGE - Checks

*** FLOP *** [6s 10s 7c]

ORIGINALDAVE - Checks
GETTINGLARGE - Bets $2
CFASTING - Folds
FIRECLOWN - Raises $4 to $4
ODLOZILIK - Raises $10 to $10
ORIGINALDAVE - Folds
GETTINGLARGE - Raises $34.50 to $36.50
FIRECLOWN - Folds
ODLOZILIK - ??
odlozilik
 
Posts: 962
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:18 pm GMT
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Top

Postby Ensano » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:10 pm GMT

if you're not ready to push then you have no business seeing the flop....
User avatar
Ensano
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 pm GMT
Location: Sturgeon Falls
Top

Postby Garoen » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:19 pm GMT

why no raise preflop? 89 is easily in any villains range as it two spades.
Garoen
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:26 am GMT
Top

Postby odlozilik » Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:19 pm GMT

Garoen wrote:why no raise preflop? 89 is easily in any villains range as it two spades.

I don't like to raise here after 2 limpers on the table full of calling stations as NL50 here mostly is.
odlozilik
 
Posts: 962
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:18 pm GMT
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Top

Postby odlozilik » Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:27 pm GMT

Ensano wrote:if you're not ready to push then you have no business seeing the flop....

The pot is raised 3 times on the flop, that's seldom to see. Furthermore, I forgot to say villain is a solid player.
odlozilik
 
Posts: 962
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:18 pm GMT
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Top

Postby Jauron » Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:23 pm GMT

I'd be raising on the button preflop.

I'm pushing here even 200BB deep, we have a re-draw if against straight and 10-10 is just unlucky. I think you need more than "solid player" to lay this down.
User avatar
Jauron
 
Posts: 2598
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:13 am GMT
Location: Living in your walls
  • YIM
Top

Postby Ensano » Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:38 pm GMT

odlozilik wrote:
Ensano wrote:if you're not ready to push then you have no business seeing the flop....

The pot is raised 3 times on the flop, that's seldom to see. Furthermore, I forgot to say villain is a solid player.


even if villian is a solid player... 66 is just as likely as TT...

so if you were in this situation and villian looks you right in the eye and says, " I have a set."

I still say you have to call... it's 50/50 he'd have TT/66 and with the extra in the pot you have to take your chances...

besides... TT raises PF.. and 89 you have the redraw against...
User avatar
Ensano
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 pm GMT
Location: Sturgeon Falls
Top

Postby Kemics » Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:55 pm GMT

i dont like it but im getting my chips in the middle here.
User avatar
Kemics
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:16 am GMT
Location: England
Top

Postby miaowmiaowchowface » Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:52 pm GMT

1. Isolate preflop almost 100% of times
2. get it in
miaowmiaowchowface
 
Posts: 1392
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:15 am GMT
Location: up
Top

Postby supafrey » Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:14 pm GMT

there is no valuable discussion to be taken from these kinds of hands
supafrey
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:42 pm GMT
Location: Ontario
Top

Postby Kemics » Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:26 pm GMT


there is no valuable discussion to be taken from these kinds of hands


no more or less than there is from your post :wink:
User avatar
Kemics
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:16 am GMT
Location: England
Top

Postby odlozilik » Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:44 pm GMT

Kemics wrote:i dont like it but im getting my chips in the middle here.

That was exactly my feeling. I simply KNEW he has 89. But how could I fold this? What if I was wrong or I fill up? I think realistically 66 was the only hand I could beat, but 89 is twice more probable to happen. I am still not sure would have been the fold excellent laydown or bad play.
So I have pushed, hated that, lost to 8c9c unimproved.
odlozilik
 
Posts: 962
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:18 pm GMT
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Top

Postby supafrey » Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:10 pm GMT

Kemics wrote:

there is no valuable discussion to be taken from these kinds of hands


no more or less than there is from your post :wink:


that's because it's in a thread where we have a set, no super crazy reads, and this exact subject has been beaten to death about a thousand times here. this is results oriented useless talk and impossible for us to do without tons of info that's not transferable through online forums.
supafrey
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:42 pm GMT
Location: Ontario
Top

Postby odlozilik » Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:05 pm GMT

I know, the set is basically almost unfoldable on the flop, but I would consider this situation a little bit special; this is limped 5 way pot with the action I rarely see and I think villain has better hand than me on the flop too often.
The question might be: would you fold if villain showed you 89?
odlozilik
 
Posts: 962
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:18 pm GMT
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Top

Postby miaowmiaowchowface » Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:32 pm GMT

supafrey wrote:there is no valuable discussion to be taken from these kinds of hands

have to agree
miaowmiaowchowface
 
Posts: 1392
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:15 am GMT
Location: up
Top

Next

Post a reply
25 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

Return to Hand Analysis and Theory

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO
Copyright © 2012 Ace Nine, LLC
Legal  |  Contact Us  |  Site Map