TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Texas Holdem Strategy, Online Poker Rooms, and Holdem Resources
  • Texas Holdem Strategy
  • Beginner's Intro
  • Calculating Odds & Outs
  • Preflop Strategy
  • When to Bet
  • Cheating
  • Position
  • Bluffing
  • Poker Help
  • Poker Forum
  • Poker Etiquette
  • Player Interviews
  • Texas Holdem Rules
  • How to Host a Game
  • Poker Tools
  • Poker Database
  • Poker Calculators
  • Online Poker Tournies
  • Holdem Odds Chart
  • Poker Articles
  • Poker Terms
  • Links
Footer





Advanced search    

  • Board index ‹ Texas Holdem and Poker Forums ‹ Poker Media
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Most Talented of the past 3 WSOP Main Event Winners?

Poker in movies and television, books, and on the internet
Forum rules
Post a reply
21 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

Who was the most talented?

Chris Moneymaker
0
No votes
Greg Raymer
32
91%
Joe Hachem
3
9%
 
Total votes : 35

Most Talented of the past 3 WSOP Main Event Winners?

Postby JewishPete » Mon May 15, 2006 11:44 am GMT

I have a pretty good idea of how this poll will turn out, but thought it would be pretty fun to see who people vote for. Make sure you add a reason as to why you voted the way you did.
JewishPete
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:59 pm GMT
Top

Postby UrAteUp » Mon May 15, 2006 12:00 pm GMT

I voted Raymer because I have not seen much of Hatchem since the WSOP. He played in the tournament of Champions but didn't make it to the final table. Other then that I have not heard or saw him in a televised game since.

I think honerable mention though belongs to Steve Dannenmann.... :)
User avatar
UrAteUp
Donktastic
 
Posts: 4994
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:18 pm GMT
Location: Missouri
  • YIM
Top

Postby MasterShake » Mon May 15, 2006 12:07 pm GMT

UrAteUp wrote:I voted Raymer because I have not seen much of Hatchem since the WSOP. He played in the tournament of Champions but didn't make it to the final table. Other then that I have not heard or saw him in a televised game since.

I think honerable mention though belongs to Steve Dannenmann.... :)


Raymer because he backed it up last year with an amazing finish and probably would have made the final table if that kid (Coulter or what ever his name is) wasn't a tard muffin from f*ck.
User avatar
MasterShake
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 8:28 pm GMT
Location: Somewhere between Caribou and New Haven.
  • Website
Top

Postby kainARGH » Mon May 15, 2006 12:58 pm GMT

MasterShake wrote:
UrAteUp wrote:I voted Raymer because I have not seen much of Hatchem since the WSOP. He played in the tournament of Champions but didn't make it to the final table. Other then that I have not heard or saw him in a televised game since.

I think honerable mention though belongs to Steve Dannenmann.... :)


Raymer because he backed it up last year with an amazing finish and probably would have made the final table if that kid (Coulter or what ever his name is) wasn't a tard muffin from f*ck.


very accurate description.
User avatar
kainARGH
 
Posts: 531
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:54 pm GMT
Top

Postby JewishPete » Mon May 15, 2006 1:02 pm GMT

I, too voted for Raymer. He just has a comprehension of the game on a level that the other two aren't quite on yet. I think Hachem is a distant second, and Moneymaker a distant third. No one can dispute that all 3 of them are excellent poker players, but I still think that Raymer is ages above the rest.
Had Aaron Kanter (I think it was him?) not given him the bad beat with the rivered flush, Raymer would have almost indefinitely made the final table (And you could argue go into the final table as chip leader) and maybe even won the thing again.
He also seems like a great guy as well.
JewishPete
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:59 pm GMT
Top

Postby Dat_Dude » Mon May 15, 2006 1:29 pm GMT

I voted Raymer. Not only did he win in 04, have a very impressive run in 05, but he also took 2nd in that 1500+ person tourney on Stars and I watched most of it.

I don't think Hachem is all that bad of a player and he did make some pretty good decisions in the WSOP (like folding hit nut flush draw when he knew Dannenman flopped his set).

Moneymaker is just a luckbox, though.
User avatar
Dat_Dude
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:49 am GMT
Location: Iowa
Top

Postby groton » Mon May 15, 2006 1:30 pm GMT

Greg fosselman Raymer

A couple Reasons
first I have seen him play Live at Foxwoods vs my Grandfather and he destoryed My Grandfather who in my eyes is one of the Better Old School Players who no one knows.

second Last years WSOP realy showed he played decently.
User avatar
groton
 
Posts: 1192
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 5:44 am GMT
Location: groton conn Redsox Nation
Top

Postby tame_deuces » Mon May 15, 2006 2:21 pm GMT

Raymer.

He knows how to play, he does the right things and doesn't hide behind some 'helmuthian' belief in his own superiority. And he is real class act at the table.
tame_deuces
 
Posts: 3045
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:24 am GMT
Location: Bergen, Norway
Top

Postby zinn0 » Mon May 15, 2006 2:24 pm GMT

Raymer for reasons given above.
User avatar
zinn0
 
Posts: 2690
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 8:32 pm GMT
Location: Ohio
Top

Postby TxShadow » Mon May 15, 2006 2:40 pm GMT

zinn0 wrote:Raymer for reasons given above.
User avatar
TxShadow
 
Posts: 613
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 5:09 pm GMT
Top

Postby MasterShake » Mon May 15, 2006 2:50 pm GMT

Holy Crap! Joe Haschem is a member here?!?!?!
User avatar
MasterShake
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 8:28 pm GMT
Location: Somewhere between Caribou and New Haven.
  • Website
Top

Postby Sean_in_NJ » Mon May 15, 2006 3:03 pm GMT

MasterShake wrote:Holy Crap! Joe Haschem is a member here?!?!?!


I think that was Moneymaker's vote.
User avatar
Sean_in_NJ
 
Posts: 3340
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:57 pm GMT
Location: New jersey
  • Website
Top

Postby xDiamond_CutteRx » Mon May 15, 2006 5:16 pm GMT

Raymer. And it's not even close. Don't get me wrong--I think Hachem is a good player and played excellently at that final table, but Raymer has a far superior record. Moneymaker was lucky, but he's not as bad as some of you guys believe.

P.S. Also for the record, having personally spoken to Aaron Kanter, he said calling Raymer was the most massive brain fart he's ever had playing Poker, and he said he actually misread the board on that hand. That's what he told me at least.
User avatar
xDiamond_CutteRx
Moderator
 
Posts: 4703
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:26 am GMT
Location: Northern California
Top

Postby Johny » Mon May 15, 2006 6:28 pm GMT

What did he think the board was?
Johny
 
Posts: 1835
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:11 pm GMT
Location: New-Brunswick, Canada
Top

Postby LeafsFan1122 » Tue May 16, 2006 12:04 am GMT

Dat_Dude wrote:I don't think Hachem is all that bad of a player and he did make some pretty good decisions in the WSOP (like folding hit nut flush draw when he knew Dannenman flopped his set).

I remember this hand, and was also impressed with Hachems laydown. He held AK :diamond: with 2 diamonds on a rag flop and got away from a huge hand. Despite this however, Raymer still gets my vote.
User avatar
LeafsFan1122
 
Posts: 1641
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:35 am GMT
Location: Thornhill
  • Website
Top

Next

Post a reply
21 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

Return to Poker Media

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO
Copyright © 2012 Ace Nine, LLC
Legal  |  Contact Us  |  Site Map