TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Texas Holdem Strategy, Online Poker Rooms, and Holdem Resources
  • Texas Holdem Strategy
  • Beginner's Intro
  • Calculating Odds & Outs
  • Preflop Strategy
  • When to Bet
  • Cheating
  • Position
  • Bluffing
  • Poker Help
  • Poker Forum
  • Poker Etiquette
  • Player Interviews
  • Texas Holdem Rules
  • How to Host a Game
  • Poker Tools
  • Poker Database
  • Poker Calculators
  • Online Poker Tournies
  • Holdem Odds Chart
  • Poker Articles
  • Poker Terms
  • Links
Footer





Advanced search    

  • Board index ‹ Texas Holdem and Poker Forums ‹ Poker and Gaming Law
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Neteller Founder Guilty of Conspiracy

Internet and local laws that affect poker, especially the UIGEA
Forum rules
Post a reply
7 posts • Page 1 of 1

Neteller Founder Guilty of Conspiracy

Postby Gunslinger » Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:05 pm GMT

The co-founder of Neteller, which processed billions of dollars in Internet gambling transactions for Americans, pleaded guilty Friday to a charge of criminal conspiracy.

Stephen Lawrence, whose company was once one of the primary ways U.S. citizens placed bets with offshore bookies, acknowledged in a federal courtroom in Manhattan that the operation was illegal.

''I came to understand that providing payment services to online gambling Web sites serving customers in the United States was wrong,'' he told the judge.

His lawyers said he was cooperating with U.S. investigators, and had also agreed to be at least partly responsible for the $100 million the government is seeking from people who were involved in the operation.


http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Online-Gambling.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
User avatar
Gunslinger
 
Posts: 818
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 8:24 pm GMT
Location: Los Angeles
Top

Postby xDiamond_CutteRx » Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:23 pm GMT

Bullshit.
User avatar
xDiamond_CutteRx
Moderator
 
Posts: 4703
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:26 am GMT
Location: Northern California
Top

Postby General Sal » Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:05 pm GMT

Damn... this is not a score for the good guys.
User avatar
General Sal
 
Posts: 1657
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 5:59 pm GMT
Location: Las Vegas
Top

Postby AHBrownell » Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:29 pm GMT

Man, this was a stupid decision on his part. I don't there is any possibility they would have found him guilty in a trial...
User avatar
AHBrownell
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:32 pm GMT
Top

Postby knode89 » Sun Jul 01, 2007 4:54 pm GMT

Actually they would have found him guilty but not under the UIEGA act but under the Wires Act. Neteller processed funds for online sports gambling as well as poker and other casino games. The Sports Bets are the ones that he was busted for. That is illegal under the wire act. Since it was his company during the time that their primary business was sports betting that is what they had nailed him on. The rest just makes them look better but it was an open and shut case against the company on the sports betting side of things.
knode89
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:43 am GMT
Top

Postby UrAteUp » Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:35 am GMT

Why didn't the dumbass just come out and say we never track what our customers do with their funds. We just bank funds for our customers. For all we know our customers are buying flowers for Aunt Milly. Never admit to shit.
User avatar
UrAteUp
Donktastic
 
Posts: 4994
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:18 pm GMT
Location: Missouri
  • YIM
Top

Knode is probably right

Postby lwestatbus » Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:01 am GMT

I think that knode is right on target with this one. The out and out betting has been illegal and pretty plainly so for a long time. As for UrAteUp's note, NeTeller operated as a UK corporation (I'm pretty sure) and US treaty arrangements with the UK probably made their transactions pretty readily available. There may have been flowers for Aunt Millie but the rest of the transactions would have been obvious as well. And I'm pretty sure that NeTeller has to institute agreements with clients at both ends of the transaction to transfer funds.

I think the DOJ had him by the short hairs and he copped a plea.
User avatar
lwestatbus
 
Posts: 1057
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:46 pm GMT
Location: Orlando
Top


Post a reply
7 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to Poker and Gaming Law

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO
Copyright © 2012 Ace Nine, LLC
Legal  |  Contact Us  |  Site Map