TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Texas Holdem Strategy, Online Poker Rooms, and Holdem Resources
  • Texas Holdem Strategy
  • Beginner's Intro
  • Calculating Odds & Outs
  • Preflop Strategy
  • When to Bet
  • Cheating
  • Position
  • Bluffing
  • Poker Help
  • Poker Forum
  • Poker Etiquette
  • Player Interviews
  • Texas Holdem Rules
  • How to Host a Game
  • Poker Tools
  • Poker Database
  • Poker Calculators
  • Online Poker Tournies
  • Holdem Odds Chart
  • Poker Articles
  • Poker Terms
  • Links
Footer





Advanced search    

  • Board index ‹ Texas Holdem and Poker Forums ‹ Hand Analysis and Theory
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Out of position - small pocket pair.

Analysis of specific hands and general game theory
Forum rules
Post a reply
15 posts • Page 1 of 1

Out of position - small pocket pair.

Postby Ciso_B » Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:39 am GMT

Ok, somewhat new to this table. I decided rather then lead out into raiser on flop, (looks weak imo), I decided I'd check call then lead almost any turn card...actually get a good turn card if I was behind.Is my line ok? Re raise pre ? Lead flop ? ,Check riase flop?

Full Tilt Poker Game #10581029556: $20,000 Guarantee (Rebuy) (79709716), Table 1 - 100/200 - No Limit Hold'em - 1:33:31 ET - 2009/02/12
Seat 1: misdirection81 (9,600)
Seat 2: 4us0306 (22,705)
Seat 3: Danimal0 (14,625)
Seat 4: STCATH1 (4,112)
Seat 5: slim258 (12,212)
Seat 7: Ciso (16,492)
Seat 8: jeyun (5,307)
Seat 9: DuckU (8,060)
Ciso posts the small blind of 100
jeyun posts the big blind of 200
The button is in seat #5
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Ciso [6h 6d]
DuckU folds
misdirection81 folds
4us0306 folds
Danimal0 folds
STCATH1 folds
slim258 has 15 seconds left to act
slim258 raises to 470
Ciso calls 370
jeyun folds
*** FLOP *** [3d 4c Kh]
Ciso checks
slim258 has 15 seconds left to act
slim258 bets 680
Ciso calls 680
*** TURN *** [3d 4c Kh] [5h]
Ciso has 15 seconds left to act
Ciso bets 1,400
slim258 has 15 seconds left to act
slim258 calls 1,400
*** RIVER *** [3d 4c Kh 5h] [5s]
Ciso has 15 seconds left to act
Ciso checks
slim258 checks
User avatar
Ciso_B
Online MTT God
 
Posts: 1985
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:21 pm GMT
Location: UK
Top

Postby xDiamond_CutteRx » Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:42 am GMT

Are you planning to c/c or c/f the river?
User avatar
xDiamond_CutteRx
Moderator
 
Posts: 4703
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:26 am GMT
Location: Northern California
Top

Postby Ciso_B » Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:33 am GMT

probably c/f most of the time. I can beat busted hearts or a stubborn Ace high only.
User avatar
Ciso_B
Online MTT God
 
Posts: 1985
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:21 pm GMT
Location: UK
Top

Postby xDiamond_CutteRx » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:17 am GMT

Ciso_B wrote:probably c/f most of the time. I can beat busted hearts or a stubborn Ace high only.

That being the case, I'm not sure how much I like the turn bet.
User avatar
xDiamond_CutteRx
Moderator
 
Posts: 4703
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:26 am GMT
Location: Northern California
Top

Postby gumbie » Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:47 am GMT

This si a 3b/fold pre in cash so i can't seeing it being a call in turnament.
User avatar
gumbie
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:17 pm GMT
Top

Postby miaowmiaowchowface » Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:18 pm GMT

ya pre is dodgy
miaowmiaowchowface
 
Posts: 1392
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:15 am GMT
Location: up
Top

Postby ErinJeff » Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:24 pm GMT

I'm OK with the pf because you're both deep and his is a raise from a stealing position. I also see an argument for 3bet pf. Depends on style/reads somewhat.
ErinJeff
 
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:05 am GMT
Location: South Carolina
Top

Postby MrDarling » Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:47 pm GMT

ErinJeff wrote:I'm OK with the pf because you're both deep and his is a raise from a stealing position.

You're contradicting your self....
MrDarling
 
Posts: 3886
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am GMT
Location: Antwerpen
  • Website
Top

Postby ErinJeff » Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:11 pm GMT

MrDarling wrote:
ErinJeff wrote:I'm OK with the pf because you're both deep and his is a raise from a stealing position.

You're contradicting your self....


How so? My thinking is that without reads I don't want to 3bet, get called OOP, miss the flop (likely), cbet the flop and then have to fold a medium sized pot that I could just setmine for a decent price with high implied odds.
ErinJeff
 
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:05 am GMT
Location: South Carolina
Top

Postby Jauron » Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:19 pm GMT

ErinJeff wrote:
MrDarling wrote:
ErinJeff wrote:I'm OK with the pf because you're both deep and his is a raise from a stealing position.

You're contradicting your self....


How so? My thinking is that without reads I don't want to 3bet, get called OOP, miss the flop (likely), cbet the flop and then have to fold a medium sized pot that I could just setmine for a decent price with high implied odds.


If he's in stealing position why would we just call (if we beat most of his range) OOP? The value in small/middle pairs is not just set mining.
User avatar
Jauron
 
Posts: 2598
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:13 am GMT
Location: Living in your walls
  • YIM
Top

Postby ErinJeff » Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:52 pm GMT

OK, I see what you and MrD are saying. I addressed that by saying that you can take the 3bet route, with the consequence that if called you need to cbet the flop and risk losing a lot more than the initial raise.

I get the point and sometimes play my small pp this way, but against an unknown I'd rather setmine. I'm not saying the other approach is wrong.
ErinJeff
 
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:05 am GMT
Location: South Carolina
Top

Postby MrDarling » Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:37 pm GMT

You contradict by saying we get the price to set mine but he rarely have a big hand that will pay us if we hit.

If we have reads then we can try to play post (ie if we know he'll cbet and give up if he miss) but readless fold>3B>call
MrDarling
 
Posts: 3886
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am GMT
Location: Antwerpen
  • Website
Top

Postby ErinJeff » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:47 pm GMT

Unless we know villain only raises premium hands we never know if we are going to get paid if we flop our set. Does this mean that you always 3bet or fold all mid-low pp against unknowns?

IMO call>3bet>fold none are that bad.
ErinJeff
 
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:05 am GMT
Location: South Carolina
Top

Postby MrDarling » Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:27 pm GMT

Its all about position and ranges.

When someone opens from LP by defult their ranges is wider then someone who opens from EP. Also, if we have position we can actually play for more then set value.

SB vs BTN is the worse place to call with pp. First, BTN have the widest possible range. Second, we're going to be OOP which make extracting value even if we hit and he happen to have a marginal hand very hard and third a good BB can profitably squeeze with a very wide range, even against 2 unknowns.
Last edited by MrDarling on Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:08 am GMT, edited 1 time in total.
MrDarling
 
Posts: 3886
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am GMT
Location: Antwerpen
  • Website
Top

Postby miaowmiaowchowface » Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:02 pm GMT

darling is totally right here, I'd only call if I thought he really sucked
miaowmiaowchowface
 
Posts: 1392
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:15 am GMT
Location: up
Top


Post a reply
15 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to Hand Analysis and Theory

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO
Copyright © 2012 Ace Nine, LLC
Legal  |  Contact Us  |  Site Map