Pokertracker

miaowmiaowchowface · by **miaowmiaowchowface** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:58 am GMT

Yozman wrote:how does pokertracker effect your play.

if their numbers are higher then you call with moderate hands, etc.

what is the 3rd number and how is it calculated

aggression factor.

I forgot the formula, but i know mines way too high so I should look into it =/

Yozman · by **Yozman** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:04 pm GMT

what is a lag players agression factor greater then 1 or somthing

kingetje · by **kingetje** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:22 pm GMT

MrDarling wrote:I did play two weeks of 16 tables without Pokertracker and sadly, I didn't do much poorly then I do now.

Could be that I run bad now, or that I run good then or I don't know what....

why are you playing such a sick ammount of tables? i have the feeling you are playing poker to get all the rakeback you can, as opposed to playing good poker and having rakeback as a nice bonus on the side... i would play way less tables if i were you

Yozman · by **Yozman** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:50 pm GMT

what is a resonable amount of tables king. what do you play

MrDarling · by **MrDarling** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:26 pm GMT

Thats a good question king, and it has nothing to do with RB anymore really.

When you're not running/playing like shit 16 tables should deliver better hourly rate then 4 tables..

Now a days I do both. Today I started 4 tables, got stuck. open 6 tables, got stucker. And decided to grind some 16 tables - need less to say 12BI later I'm not sure it was the best decision.

Can't say it all my fault - losing 3 BI AI pf with AK (could beat AKs, 88 and AQo)
as well as AxKc < 9d9c on a 4Bet JcTc3c flop

PLOCH · by **PLOCH** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:17 pm GMT

MrDarling wrote:Thats a good question king, and it has nothing to do with RB anymore really.

When you're not running/playing like shit 16 tables should deliver better hourly rate then 4 tables..

Now a days I do both. Today I started 4 tables, got stuck. open 6 tables, got stucker. And decided to grind some 16 tables - need less to say 12BI later I'm not sure it was the best decision.

Can't say it all my fault - losing 3 BI AI pf with AK (could beat AKs, 88 and AQo)
as well as AxKc < 9d9c on a 4Bet JcTc3c flop

Honestly, playing 16 tables cannot possibly be fun or make you a better player. It sounds like it's all about rakeback to me.

miaowmiaowchowface · by **miaowmiaowchowface** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:22 pm GMT

PLOCH wrote:
MrDarling wrote:Thats a good question king, and it has nothing to do with RB anymore really.

When you're not running/playing like shit 16 tables should deliver better hourly rate then 4 tables..

Now a days I do both. Today I started 4 tables, got stuck. open 6 tables, got stucker. And decided to grind some 16 tables - need less to say 12BI later I'm not sure it was the best decision.

Can't say it all my fault - losing 3 BI AI pf with AK (could beat AKs, 88 and AQo)
as well as AxKc < 9d9c on a 4Bet JcTc3c flop

Honestly, playing 16 tables cannot possibly be fun or make you a better player. It sounds like it's all about rakeback to me.

i quite enjoy mass multitabling sessions actually, if ur playing less theres a bunch of downtime and you might start making spewy moves

MrDarling · by **MrDarling** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:46 am GMT

its funny how people who never tried something can pass judgment on that.

I did learn a lot from playing 16 tables and I do really enjoy it. Its a different kind of poker, but it still poker.

kompis · by **kompis** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:25 am GMT

if you play 16 tables at a time you are a c*nt

miaowmiaowchowface · by **miaowmiaowchowface** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 5:16 am GMT

MrDarling wrote:its funny how people who never tried something can pass judgment on that.

I did learn a lot from playing 16 tables and I do really enjoy it. Its a different kind of poker, but it still poker.

only difference is the excessive misclick folding of like all pocket pairs preflop

supafrey · by **supafrey** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:33 am GMT

MrDarling wrote:its funny how people who never tried something can pass judgment on that.

I did learn a lot from playing 16 tables and I do really enjoy it. Its a different kind of poker, but it still poker.

Okay, I guess I'm allowed to comment, then. :roll:

I think 16 is very likely too many for you.

kingetje · by **kingetje** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:36 am GMT

Yozman wrote:what is a resonable amount of tables king. what do you play

i play 4 tables usually

MrDarling · by **MrDarling** » Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:55 pm GMT

supafrey wrote:
MrDarling wrote:its funny how people who never tried something can pass judgment on that.

I did learn a lot from playing 16 tables and I do really enjoy it. Its a different kind of poker, but it still poker.

Okay, I guess I'm allowed to comment, then.

I think 16 is very likely too many for you.

No, you can comment about playing 16 tables in general, but not on my ability to play 16 tables...

And no, 16 tables are not too much for me. When I suck, I suck just as hard playing 4 tables (or even 2 tables HU) when I'm good, I kill 16 tables. Ok, granted, not as high BB/100 as per 4 tables, but I think my hourly rate is better.

miaowmiaowchowface · by **miaowmiaowchowface** » Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:03 pm GMT

my question is how the f*ck do u take detailed notes... i dont really bother takin notes anyway but srsly lol its hard

Pokertracker

Who is online