which are limping hands in NL?
34 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Wow, I really need to check my game .
I actually raise with KQs, pp and even Axs
I don't play Axo or most off suited connectors.
as for suited connectors, I'm also not crazy about them, I might limp from late position or even call a small raise, but usually I prefer to dump them preflop.
I'm really not comfortable playing small flush. Is it just me, and is it really wrong?
I actually raise with KQs, pp and even Axs
I don't play Axo or most off suited connectors.
as for suited connectors, I'm also not crazy about them, I might limp from late position or even call a small raise, but usually I prefer to dump them preflop.
I'm really not comfortable playing small flush. Is it just me, and is it really wrong?
- MrDarling
- Posts: 3886
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am GMT
- Location: Antwerpen
MrDarling wrote:Wow, I really need to check my game .
I actually raise with KQs, pp and even Axs
I don't play Axo or most off suited connectors.
as for suited connectors, I'm also not crazy about them, I might limp from late position or even call a small raise, but usually I prefer to dump them preflop.
I'm really not comfortable playing small flush. Is it just me, and is it really wrong?
nah you sound like your playing soild
me and SUPA and alot of us others here play kinda cheeky since we can normoly out play the AVG player postflop.
-

groton - Posts: 1192
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 5:44 am GMT
- Location: groton conn Redsox Nation
It really depends on the table and what kind of players you are seated with. What works in some conditions may be inherently wrong with other players/stacksizes/average potsizes.
- tame_deuces
- Posts: 3045
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:24 am GMT
- Location: Bergen, Norway
supafrey wrote:limp in playing 200NL and up...
23s-KQs
24s-JKs
22-TT
47s-TKs
9Ks
Axs
Kxs
89o-QKo
what does he mean by 23s-KQs? Any possible combo inbetween, cause that seems like alot.
- Incognito129
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am GMT
Incognito129 wrote:supafrey wrote:limp in playing 200NL and up...
23s-KQs
24s-JKs
22-TT
47s-TKs
9Ks
Axs
Kxs
89o-QKo
what does he mean by 23s-KQs? Any possible combo inbetween, cause that seems like alot.
No. He means connected hands by 23s-KQs.
23s-34s-45s-56s-67s-etc...
24s-KJs = 24s-35s-46s... etc
-

Skribbles - Posts: 2070
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 7:11 pm GMT
- Location: Calgary, Alberta
Skribbles wrote:Incognito129 wrote:supafrey wrote:limp in playing 200NL and up...
23s-KQs
24s-JKs
22-TT
47s-TKs
9Ks
Axs
Kxs
89o-QKo
what does he mean by 23s-KQs? Any possible combo inbetween, cause that seems like alot.
No. He means connected hands by 23s-KQs.
23s-34s-45s-56s-67s-etc...
24s-KJs = 24s-35s-46s... etc
Oh ok. So what does 24s-JKs and 47s-TKs mean?
- Incognito129
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am GMT
24 up to JK are two cards separated with only one card.
47 up to TK are two cards separated by 3 cards. All have a str8 potential.
But to be honest, if you don't know that by now, best not play them.
Most of us are not as lose as Supa is ...
I rarely play low connected cards and even more rarely low 1 card separated connectors (is there a name for those)
47 up to TK are two cards separated by 3 cards. All have a str8 potential.
But to be honest, if you don't know that by now, best not play them.
Most of us are not as lose as Supa is ...
I rarely play low connected cards and even more rarely low 1 card separated connectors (is there a name for those)
- MrDarling
- Posts: 3886
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am GMT
- Location: Antwerpen
MrDarling wrote:24 up to JK are two cards separated with only one card.
47 up to TK are two cards separated by 3 cards. All have a str8 potential.
But to be honest, if you don't know that by now, best not play them.
Most of us are not as lose as Supa is ...
I rarely play low connected cards and even more rarely low 1 card separated connectors (is there a name for those)
what do you mean "if you don't know that by now", how do you know how long i've played lol.
- Incognito129
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am GMT
This is not meant as an insult or an imply you don't know the game.
Thing is Supa is a very lose player. If you don't see the statue of the above pairs of card (suited connectors , 1 card removed suited connectors etc...) I did assume you are not playing the game that long , hence I recommend you didn't play them most of the time.
No offense intended what so ever.
Thing is Supa is a very lose player. If you don't see the statue of the above pairs of card (suited connectors , 1 card removed suited connectors etc...) I did assume you are not playing the game that long , hence I recommend you didn't play them most of the time.
No offense intended what so ever.
- MrDarling
- Posts: 3886
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am GMT
- Location: Antwerpen
MrDarling wrote:24 up to JK are two cards separated with only one card.
47 up to TK are two cards separated by 3 cards.
I rarely play low connected cards and even more rarely low 1 card separated connectors (is there a name for those)
Suited one, two and three gaps are the "official" names.
- Loonbat
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 3:06 pm GMT
- Location: Hyde Park, VT
I play so damn tight then I rarely play anything under a pp or AX in EP. Oh well...to me tight is right. Keeps my roll in the positive side and nmot the negative side....
Seriously I usually only play top 10 hands in EP, top 20 in MP and about any in LP.
Seriously I usually only play top 10 hands in EP, top 20 in MP and about any in LP.
-

UrAteUp - Donktastic
- Posts: 4994
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:18 pm GMT
- Location: Missouri
Just raise most of the time when playing these. Offsuit unconnected high cards suck in limpfests IMHO.
They're marginal winners at best, but are ok for throwing in some more hands into the raising ranges so we don't look like rocks - if we happen to be at a table were we think people notice these things.
They're marginal winners at best, but are ok for throwing in some more hands into the raising ranges so we don't look like rocks - if we happen to be at a table were we think people notice these things.
- tame_deuces
- Posts: 3045
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:24 am GMT
- Location: Bergen, Norway
34 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Return to Rules and Beginner Questions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

