Right or Wrong ruling?
Moderators: jimmer, HalfSugar, xDiamond_CutteRx
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
Right or Wrong ruling?
The following is the statement I've given to Santa Fe Station Hotel/Casino management following the incident- certain names are masked to protect the identities-
"On 11/06/09, approx 3:30am, I was playing poker at Santa Fe Station Hotel on table 1, seat 9. Game was 1/2 No Limit Texas Hold Em. I had a "Live Straddle" of $4 in first position to act. First player to act after me raised to $15, there was approx 1 or 2 callers for $15, other than myself, holding 4 clubs/5 clubs as my hole cards. Flop was 457. Me, being first to act, checked. next player (who raised to $15), bet $100. Another player called the $100, and I then raised all-in for approx $200 total. Initial bettor called, other player folded. I immediately "Tabled My Cards", and other player said, "You have me", then proceeded to physically leave the table, with his cards left *face down*. "G****e" was the dealer, and proceeded to deal the rest of the board "the turn and the river", regardless of the other player leaving the table. The turn was another 7, the river a 6. Since other player's cards were "unprotected and not tabled" (they were left face down, with no 'card protector' left on them, I asked G****e the dealer why he hadn't "killed" the other player's hand. G****e then looked across the poker room for the player that walked away, at which point other player said, "Wait, I think I got him". G****e still hadn't killed opponents hand, and opponent returned to the table to show his hole cards, Jack, Jack. at which point G****e pushed that player the approx $600 pot- regardless of the other player, leaving the table mid-hand (player left on the flop, the turn and river cards not yet dealt), and leaving the table with his cards face down and "unprotected", regardless of the stated poker rules of "Every player must protect his/her own hand", and that players must remain in the vicinity of the poker table during hands they were involved in.
I was unjustly denied the approx $600 pot, regardless of the violation of the other player's rules, and for the dealer to "kill" his hand in a timely manner, and not calling a floor supervisor over to render a proper decision.
L** was the poker supervisor on duty at the time."
Question is does JJ deserve the pot? FYI, this was a cash game, where all-ins do NOT have to be shown. My opinion is dealer should have turbo-mucked other player's hand- cards were unattended, seat was unoccupied, and player's statement of "You Have me" before walking away should have been an easy muck- Since the money was already in and no more action was possible, I agree with the turn and river being dealt- however I do not agree with not mucking an unprotected, untabled and unoccupied hand. In a cash game, if someone wants to muck, you let them muck, plain and simple.
Opinions?
"On 11/06/09, approx 3:30am, I was playing poker at Santa Fe Station Hotel on table 1, seat 9. Game was 1/2 No Limit Texas Hold Em. I had a "Live Straddle" of $4 in first position to act. First player to act after me raised to $15, there was approx 1 or 2 callers for $15, other than myself, holding 4 clubs/5 clubs as my hole cards. Flop was 457. Me, being first to act, checked. next player (who raised to $15), bet $100. Another player called the $100, and I then raised all-in for approx $200 total. Initial bettor called, other player folded. I immediately "Tabled My Cards", and other player said, "You have me", then proceeded to physically leave the table, with his cards left *face down*. "G****e" was the dealer, and proceeded to deal the rest of the board "the turn and the river", regardless of the other player leaving the table. The turn was another 7, the river a 6. Since other player's cards were "unprotected and not tabled" (they were left face down, with no 'card protector' left on them, I asked G****e the dealer why he hadn't "killed" the other player's hand. G****e then looked across the poker room for the player that walked away, at which point other player said, "Wait, I think I got him". G****e still hadn't killed opponents hand, and opponent returned to the table to show his hole cards, Jack, Jack. at which point G****e pushed that player the approx $600 pot- regardless of the other player, leaving the table mid-hand (player left on the flop, the turn and river cards not yet dealt), and leaving the table with his cards face down and "unprotected", regardless of the stated poker rules of "Every player must protect his/her own hand", and that players must remain in the vicinity of the poker table during hands they were involved in.
I was unjustly denied the approx $600 pot, regardless of the violation of the other player's rules, and for the dealer to "kill" his hand in a timely manner, and not calling a floor supervisor over to render a proper decision.
L** was the poker supervisor on duty at the time."
Question is does JJ deserve the pot? FYI, this was a cash game, where all-ins do NOT have to be shown. My opinion is dealer should have turbo-mucked other player's hand- cards were unattended, seat was unoccupied, and player's statement of "You Have me" before walking away should have been an easy muck- Since the money was already in and no more action was possible, I agree with the turn and river being dealt- however I do not agree with not mucking an unprotected, untabled and unoccupied hand. In a cash game, if someone wants to muck, you let them muck, plain and simple.
Opinions?
jeffonline wrote: This relationship could put you on tilt be very careful, you need to define your hand job, next time raise a larger amount.
-

raisebot - Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:06 am GMT
- Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 7681
Re: Right or Wrong ruling?
What happened when you protested? Was the floor not called? Something stinks.
Guess what? I got a fever, and the only prescription, is more cowbell!
-

HalfSugar - King Moderator
- Posts: 5818
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:20 pm GMT
- Location: UK
Re: Right or Wrong ruling?
Floor was NOT called, dealer shipped the pot to him, then later chastised ME for not "requesting" floor to be called. I left the poker room to donk off a bit on slots, at which point I got into an argument with one of the slot team/count team, who couldn't wait 3 minutes until my "bonus round" was done, and for the machine to pay me off. I was then sarcastically told by slot team to "Come again soon!", at which point I asked him to repeat himself, he did, I then asked for the casino manager's name on duty. Slot team member responded "I don't know", then physically put his hand on me. Security came, I got the information from security regarding who's running the casino at that hour.
Spoke to graveyard casino manager, and I laid it all on them. Manager reviewed both surveillance videos, then had a lengthy discussion with the poker room manager on duty at the time.
I filled out 2 different complaint forms- 1 of which is the one I posted above which will be given to the Nevada Gaming Control Board, the other form regarding the slot incident, which will be used for that employee's file and/or disciplinary use.
Awaiting a call back from the main casino manager today. Both videos are now unable to be deleted, since an incident was filed regarding them, and Gaming must now investigate.
Spoke to graveyard casino manager, and I laid it all on them. Manager reviewed both surveillance videos, then had a lengthy discussion with the poker room manager on duty at the time.
I filled out 2 different complaint forms- 1 of which is the one I posted above which will be given to the Nevada Gaming Control Board, the other form regarding the slot incident, which will be used for that employee's file and/or disciplinary use.
Awaiting a call back from the main casino manager today. Both videos are now unable to be deleted, since an incident was filed regarding them, and Gaming must now investigate.
jeffonline wrote: This relationship could put you on tilt be very careful, you need to define your hand job, next time raise a larger amount.
-

raisebot - Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:06 am GMT
- Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 7681
Re: Right or Wrong ruling?
I'm unsure on the official rulling in the US, but in the UK the hand would/should of been mucked as soon as he stands up.
No matter where you are in the world, I think his actions (leaving the table, saying "you have me" and not showing his cards) would constitute him mucking his hand.
I would question whether there is a certain time limit for you to make a complaint about the hand? Once again, I have no idea on the answer, but, do you have to draw it to someones attention before the next hand is dealt etc?, but apart from that I think you should win this one 100%.
No matter where you are in the world, I think his actions (leaving the table, saying "you have me" and not showing his cards) would constitute him mucking his hand.
I would question whether there is a certain time limit for you to make a complaint about the hand? Once again, I have no idea on the answer, but, do you have to draw it to someones attention before the next hand is dealt etc?, but apart from that I think you should win this one 100%.
Good things come to those who wait!
-

jimmer - Moderator
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:23 pm GMT
Re: Right or Wrong ruling?
I got a personal phone call tonight from the Director of Casino Operations himself, who profusely apologized for the incidents, and promised me they WILL pay me the entire pot amount out of their own pockets, to just stop by on Monday when the main Poker Room manager returns from vacation, to pick up my money.
Was kinda surreal getting that phone call, at 10pm, especially when I went all day without the promised phone call from them, and then being informed they'll pay me.
Sad thing is I actually sorta like the dealer that was involved in dealing out the hand, and what disciplinary actions will now be taken against him, but apparently, management and/or Gaming Control reviewed the videos, and saw that something was rotten in Denmark.
Last thing I expected was to be reimbursed for the incident, especially coming from a casino. After all, casinos are in the business of making money, not paying money. Quite honestly, that phone call, and the promise to repay me, sorta shocked the shit out of me.
Was kinda surreal getting that phone call, at 10pm, especially when I went all day without the promised phone call from them, and then being informed they'll pay me.
Sad thing is I actually sorta like the dealer that was involved in dealing out the hand, and what disciplinary actions will now be taken against him, but apparently, management and/or Gaming Control reviewed the videos, and saw that something was rotten in Denmark.
Last thing I expected was to be reimbursed for the incident, especially coming from a casino. After all, casinos are in the business of making money, not paying money. Quite honestly, that phone call, and the promise to repay me, sorta shocked the shit out of me.
jeffonline wrote: This relationship could put you on tilt be very careful, you need to define your hand job, next time raise a larger amount.
-

raisebot - Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:06 am GMT
- Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 7681
Re: Right or Wrong ruling?
$100 says your head is in a vice within 5mins of stepping into the casino again.
Guess what? I got a fever, and the only prescription, is more cowbell!
-

HalfSugar - King Moderator
- Posts: 5818
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:20 pm GMT
- Location: UK
Re: Right or Wrong ruling?
or your car will blow up when you leave.HalfSugar wrote:$100 says your head is in a vice within 5mins of stepping into the casino again.
Good things come to those who wait!
-

jimmer - Moderator
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:23 pm GMT
Re: Right or Wrong ruling?
jimmer wrote:or your car will blow up when you leave.HalfSugar wrote:$100 says your head is in a vice within 5mins of stepping into the casino again.
Will never happen. If my car blows up, their $600 gets burnt to a crisp. If they don't blow up my car, they have a chance of me losing the money back to them.
Simple economics.
jeffonline wrote: This relationship could put you on tilt be very careful, you need to define your hand job, next time raise a larger amount.
-

raisebot - Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:06 am GMT
- Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 7681
Re: Right or Wrong ruling?
Well they paid me today. Unfortunately though, I need to buy a new car now. They stuck my car in a vice as I was leaving. 
jeffonline wrote: This relationship could put you on tilt be very careful, you need to define your hand job, next time raise a larger amount.
-

raisebot - Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:06 am GMT
- Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 7681
Re: Right or Wrong ruling?
raisebot wrote:Well they paid me today. Unfortunately though, I need to buy a new car now. They stuck my car in a vice as I was leaving.
Damn, we were so close!
Suit Up!
-

xDiamond_CutteRx - Moderator
- Posts: 4666
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:26 am GMT
- Location: Northern California
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
Return to Casino Texas Hold'em Poker
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests



