TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Texas Holdem Strategy, Online Poker Rooms, and Holdem Resources
  • Texas Holdem Strategy
  • Beginner's Intro
  • Calculating Odds & Outs
  • Preflop Strategy
  • When to Bet
  • Cheating
  • Position
  • Bluffing
  • Poker Help
  • Poker Forum
  • Poker Etiquette
  • Player Interviews
  • Texas Holdem Rules
  • How to Host a Game
  • Poker Tools
  • Poker Database
  • Poker Calculators
  • Online Poker Tournies
  • Holdem Odds Chart
  • Poker Articles
  • Poker Terms
  • Links
Footer





Advanced search    

  • Board index ‹ Other Topics ‹ Non-Poker Talk
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Presidential Candidate

General conversations not related to poker
Forum rules
Post a reply
16 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

Presidential Candidate

Postby General Sal » Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:57 pm GMT

So, I asked Carson this question and now I ask you the same: Which presidential candidate supports the reversal of the UIGEA? Or rather who would we vote into office that is pro-online poker/gambling?
User avatar
General Sal
 
Posts: 1657
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 5:59 pm GMT
Location: Las Vegas
Top

Postby exit music » Thu Feb 07, 2008 12:45 am GMT

They generally prefer to worry about things that are actually relevant... vote for Clinton, she's ballin, she'll fix up your health-care system quick-snap.
User avatar
exit music
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:27 am GMT
Location: Toronto
Top

Postby supafrey » Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:14 am GMT

exit music wrote:They generally prefer to worry about things that are actually relevant... vote for Clinton, she's ballin, she'll fix up your health-care system quick-snap.


A crippled economy isn't relevant? Are you purposefully being obtuse or is being supa-like snarky just In these days?
supafrey
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:42 pm GMT
Location: Ontario
Top

Postby supafrey » Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:15 am GMT

To answer the question, isn't Ron Paul a complete anti-government nut? I'm fairly certain he's explicitly spoken out against stuff like this...

If only he wasn't loony
supafrey
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:42 pm GMT
Location: Ontario
Top

Postby exit music » Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:49 am GMT

I'm obtuse, and my snarkyness has nothing to do w/ you
User avatar
exit music
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:27 am GMT
Location: Toronto
Top

Postby xDiamond_CutteRx » Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:07 am GMT

Yes, Ron Paul is the only candidate to specifically address the UIGEA. And yes, he is also completely f*cking nuts. I like that he's anti-interventionist and pro-gambling (well, against restrictions anyway), but it doesn't change the fact that he's a racist kook who doesn't believe there is such a thing as "society."

Fwiw, Obama is the only candidate I've heard admit to playing Poker for money, but any Democrat is likely to sign legislation regulating online Poker and overturning the UIGEA, as all the bills have been coming from Democratic sponsors. Republicans would be likely to overturn the bill to satisfy their moronic religious constituencies, but neither Romney nor McCain really cares as much about the religious nuts as the idiot in the office now.

Democratic Congress + President is the best outlook for online Poker players in the near future. It could change, but that's certainly the way the winds blow now.
User avatar
xDiamond_CutteRx
Moderator
 
Posts: 4703
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:26 am GMT
Location: Northern California
Top

Postby HalfSugar » Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:40 am GMT

Where is that big haired mardy biatch who used to post angsty things here and loved Ron Paul? Who's laughing now? That's right, everyone, since that whack job has about three votes so far in total :lol:

That crazy Internet momentum really took off..........
User avatar
HalfSugar
King Moderator
 
Posts: 6228
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:20 pm GMT
Location: UK
  • Website
Top

Postby tame_deuces » Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:53 am GMT

Ron Paul doesn't seem that bad. Your classic right winged semi-libertarian type. Easy to portray as loony though because the changes seem so radical. Building down the state power seems like an inevitable rational choice down the road though, we're getting a little docile on what we allow the government to do these days.

Not my cup of tea however. I prefer libertarianism leaning to the left.
tame_deuces
 
Posts: 3045
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:24 am GMT
Location: Bergen, Norway
Top

Postby supafrey » Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:40 am GMT

tame_deuces wrote:Ron Paul doesn't seem that bad. Your classic right winged semi-libertarian type. Easy to portray as loony though because the changes seem so radical. Building down the state power seems like an inevitable rational choice down the road though, we're getting a little docile on what we allow the government to do these days.

Not my cup of tea however. I prefer libertarianism leaning to the left.


whatever we say, ubermenschzje
supafrey
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:42 pm GMT
Location: Ontario
Top

Postby tame_deuces » Thu Feb 07, 2008 12:21 pm GMT

supafrey wrote:
tame_deuces wrote:Ron Paul doesn't seem that bad. Your classic right winged semi-libertarian type. Easy to portray as loony though because the changes seem so radical. Building down the state power seems like an inevitable rational choice down the road though, we're getting a little docile on what we allow the government to do these days.

Not my cup of tea however. I prefer libertarianism leaning to the left.


whatever we say, ubermenschzje


We can still be friends, you fascist.
tame_deuces
 
Posts: 3045
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:24 am GMT
Location: Bergen, Norway
Top

Postby supafrey » Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:13 pm GMT

only economically fascist.
supafrey
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:42 pm GMT
Location: Ontario
Top

Postby Dave B » Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:09 pm GMT

I think Helmuth would make a nice president.

Da Brat for Prez!


Can you imagine the debates? He would blow up every few minutes and vow to bomb Canada.
User avatar
Dave B
Tournament Champion
 
Posts: 5010
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 10:49 am GMT
Location: Minnesota
Top

Postby UrAteUp » Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:02 pm GMT

Dave B wrote: He would blow up every few minutes and vow to bomb Canada.


Imagine a world without Supa.

:)
User avatar
UrAteUp
Donktastic
 
Posts: 4994
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:18 pm GMT
Location: Missouri
  • YIM
Top

Postby snoogins47 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:54 am GMT

Dave B wrote:I think Helmuth would make a nice president.

Da Brat for Prez!


Can you imagine the debates? He would blow up every few minutes and vow to bomb Canada.


Somebody start figuring out what it takes to get somebody as an official write-in candidate in the general.
User avatar
snoogins47
 
Posts: 2358
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:31 pm GMT
Location: He Could Be From Portugal
  • Website
Top

Postby Felix » Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:49 am GMT

Geno wrote:Where is that big haired mardy biatch who used to post angsty things here and loved Ron Paul? Who's laughing now? That's right, everyone, since that whack job has about three votes so far in total :lol:


Someone go banswitch happy? :wink:
Felix
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 12:32 am GMT
Location: Texas
Top

Next

Post a reply
16 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

Return to Non-Poker Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO
Copyright © 2012 Ace Nine, LLC
Legal  |  Contact Us  |  Site Map