QJ facing an all-in bet for half my stack.
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
QJ facing an all-in bet for half my stack.
It's a $1 45 seater sng. We are down to the last 18 players. BBigLebowski is new to the table so i have no info on him. FlushNizer is a pretty passive player. Should i call raise or fold and why?
PokerStars Game #27697100738: Tournament #160152986, $1.00+$0.20 Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2009/05/01 11:15:10 ET
Table '160152986 1' 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: styphe (9170 in chips)
Seat 2: FlushNizer (3760 in chips)
Seat 3: BBigLebowski (1224 in chips)
Seat 4: jbdb3 (2637 in chips)
Seat 5: BubbleOh7 (2146 in chips)
Seat 6: shadyowls (6833 in chips)
Seat 7: Bongholio21 (3883 in chips)
Seat 8: Anguillian (3230 in chips)
BBigLebowski: posts small blind 100
jbdb3: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to jbdb3 [Qc Js]
BubbleOh7: folds
shadyowls: folds
Bongholio21: folds
Anguillian: folds
styphe: folds
FlushNizer: calls 200
BBigLebowski: raises 1024 to 1224 and is all-in
jbdb3: ????
PokerStars Game #27697100738: Tournament #160152986, $1.00+$0.20 Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2009/05/01 11:15:10 ET
Table '160152986 1' 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: styphe (9170 in chips)
Seat 2: FlushNizer (3760 in chips)
Seat 3: BBigLebowski (1224 in chips)
Seat 4: jbdb3 (2637 in chips)
Seat 5: BubbleOh7 (2146 in chips)
Seat 6: shadyowls (6833 in chips)
Seat 7: Bongholio21 (3883 in chips)
Seat 8: Anguillian (3230 in chips)
BBigLebowski: posts small blind 100
jbdb3: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to jbdb3 [Qc Js]
BubbleOh7: folds
shadyowls: folds
Bongholio21: folds
Anguillian: folds
styphe: folds
FlushNizer: calls 200
BBigLebowski: raises 1024 to 1224 and is all-in
jbdb3: ????
-

jimmer - Moderator
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:23 pm GMT
gumbie wrote:Are you drunk jimmer?
I appreciate this looks poor hand, but with a limp from the button and a raise from the SB I was wondering if they were just fighting for the blinds and therefore if there was extra value in shoving myself.
Obviously not huh?
-

jimmer - Moderator
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:23 pm GMT
jimmer wrote:gumbie wrote:Are you drunk jimmer?
I appreciate this looks poor hand, but with a limp from the button and a raise from the SB I was wondering if they were just fighting for the blinds and therefore if there was extra value in shoving myself.
Obviously not huh?
No, because you have no fold equity and have to go to showdown. Shoving is not going to accomplish anything except to get snapped off in the cases where the button limped a strong hand; in relation to the other guy, it's the same as calling, and this is a bad call.
-

xDiamond_CutteRx - Moderator
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:26 am GMT
- Location: Northern California
Should be an easy fold
Your hand is marginal at best
If you call and lose, you'd be left very short
You've got another to act after you who could have anything really
You'd be calling this on the hopes that BBigLebowski has J 10 or worse or maybe a baby pair for a race, and that FlushNizer will get out of the way. More likely with QJ you're dominated.
Your hand is marginal at best
If you call and lose, you'd be left very short
You've got another to act after you who could have anything really
You'd be calling this on the hopes that BBigLebowski has J 10 or worse or maybe a baby pair for a race, and that FlushNizer will get out of the way. More likely with QJ you're dominated.
- TomJQKA
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 11:08 pm GMT
- Location: New Jersey
only btn liming might make this a fold otherwise its a snap call
i probably shove after all its a btn limp and even tho they might limp some big hands they usually limp crap
i probably shove after all its a btn limp and even tho they might limp some big hands they usually limp crap
- Jernej Zorec
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:19 pm GMT
- Location: Selnica, Slovenia
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

