TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Texas Holdem Strategy, Online Poker Rooms, and Holdem Resources
  • Texas Holdem Strategy
  • Beginner's Intro
  • Calculating Odds & Outs
  • Preflop Strategy
  • When to Bet
  • Cheating
  • Position
  • Bluffing
  • Poker Help
  • Poker Forum
  • Poker Etiquette
  • Player Interviews
  • Texas Holdem Rules
  • How to Host a Game
  • Poker Tools
  • Poker Database
  • Poker Calculators
  • Online Poker Tournies
  • Holdem Odds Chart
  • Poker Articles
  • Poker Terms
  • Links
Footer





Advanced search    

  • Board index ‹ Texas Holdem and Poker Forums ‹ Hand Analysis and Theory
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Login

Reverse timing tell

Analysis of specific hands and general game theory
Forum rules
Post a reply
19 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

Reverse timing tell

Postby MrDarling » Wed Apr 09, 2008 8:18 am GMT

This is something I came up on recently and its the first time I used it.

As you all should know timing of opponent action is one of the biggest tells online, as well as the bet sizing.

In the following hand I was doubting on the flop if I should fold, call or raise.
Folding is defiantly a valid option, as one of my outs put 4 to the straight and it should prove hard to get paid, also, there is a chance I'm drawing to a split.

Raising is an option, but BVB it really hard to make someone fold TP, and its such a drawy flop I might be forced to put all my money here, which I don't really want.
So I decided if I hit an 8, I continue with normal value bets, but if I hit a K I'll go for a 'tricky' play and insta pot the turn + river.

If UB had a max button I would attempt an insta shove, but I think insta potting is such a fishy play and really look weak faking strong.

Villain tank both turn and river, but ended up calling.
Seeing is hand he probably call any turn bet, but I think it would have been really hard for him to call river with this "move"

Hand #51977402-20819 at Sunnyslope (No Limit Hold'em)
Started at 08/Apr/08 14:37:50

sebkrol18 is at seat 0 with $197.35.
DRedstone is at seat 1 with $211.65.
christofurio is at seat 2 with $95.
dabol is at seat 3 with $84.10.
meeelosh is at seat 4 with $147.50.
rko111 is at seat 5 with $343.60.
The button is at seat 5.

sebkrol18 posts the small blind of $1.
DRedstone posts the big blind of $2.

sebkrol18: -- --
DRedstone: Jc 9c
christofurio: -- --
dabol: -- --
meeelosh: -- --
rko111: -- --

Pre-flop:

christofurio folds. dabol folds. meeelosh folds.
rko111 folds. sebkrol18 raises to $6. DRedstone
calls.

Flop (board: Qs Ts Ad):

sebkrol18 bets $12. DRedstone calls.

Turn (board: Qs Ts Ad Kd):

sebkrol18 checks. DRedstone bets $36. sebkrol18
calls.

River (board: Qs Ts Ad Kd 5h):

sebkrol18 checks. DRedstone bets $108. sebkrol18
calls.



Showdown:

DRedstone shows Jc 9c.
DRedstone has Jc Qs Ts Ad Kd: straight, ace high.
sebkrol18 mucks cards.
(sebkrol18 has Ac Kc.)


Hand #51977402-20819 Summary:

$3 is raked from a pot of $324.
$.50 jackpot contribution is raked.
DRedstone wins $320.50 with straight, ace high.
----------------------------------------------------------------
MrDarling
 
Posts: 3886
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am GMT
Location: Antwerpen
  • Website
Top

Postby gumbie » Wed Apr 09, 2008 8:39 am GMT

:sigh:
User avatar
gumbie
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:17 pm GMT
Top

Postby xDiamond_CutteRx » Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:22 pm GMT

Timing means nothing IMO. There are a hundred reasons why someone might take a while to get his bet out: bad connection, too many tables open, chatting with the wife, etc.

I think you just caught a donk is all.
User avatar
xDiamond_CutteRx
Moderator
 
Posts: 4703
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:26 am GMT
Location: Northern California
Top

Re: Reverse timing tell

Postby Sean_in_NJ » Wed Apr 09, 2008 3:34 pm GMT

MrDarling wrote:As you all should know timing of opponent action is one of the biggest tells online


Yeah, I'm with DC. I never paid any attention to this at all.
User avatar
Sean_in_NJ
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:57 pm GMT
Location: New jersey
  • Website
Top

Postby miaowmiaowchowface » Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:32 pm GMT

They aren't always relevant, but a good application is to the guys who are talking, or sometimes the ones who say ZZZZ. They're prolly more "in the game" than anyone.
miaowmiaowchowface
 
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:15 am GMT
Location: up
Top

Postby Jauron » Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:50 pm GMT

If he's multi-tabling is he even going to notice?
User avatar
Jauron
 
Posts: 2598
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:13 am GMT
Location: Living in your walls
  • YIM
Top

Postby MrDarling » Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:00 am GMT

No offense guys, but I do this for a living.

Timing and bet sizes are few of the only tells available online.
And though when someone takes some time to act doesn't always means he think about what to do, most of the time it does.
However when someone insta act, it is pretty obvious he knew what he was going to do before hand and didn't have to think about it.
What it means still depend on the type of player and any reads you have. My notes on player are full of timing tells.
MrDarling
 
Posts: 3886
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am GMT
Location: Antwerpen
  • Website
Top

Postby gumbie » Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:04 am GMT

The only valid tells are the instacall and the "slight hesitation" differing from normal rythm, all other timing stuff happens by accident or on purpose.
User avatar
gumbie
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:17 pm GMT
Top

Postby MJJ » Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:07 am GMT

gumbie wrote: all other timing stuff happens by accident or on purpose.


No one can argue with that :roll:
MJJ
 
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:24 pm GMT
Top

Postby MrDarling » Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:07 am GMT

all insta acts are valid (insta check/call/raise)
And in some rare occasions, delays also offer some information. Though often, not reliable enough to base entire decision upon. Its just one added clue to the mountain of information we need to digest when making a decision.
MrDarling
 
Posts: 3886
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am GMT
Location: Antwerpen
  • Website
Top

Postby gumbie » Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:10 am GMT

MrDarling wrote:all insta acts are valid (insta check/call/raise)
And in some rare occasions, delays also offer some information. Though often, not reliable enough to base entire decision upon. Its just one added clue to the mountain of information we need to digest when making a decision.


Delays offer information when ppl (like you) are doing them on purpose, so I advise against doing it.
User avatar
gumbie
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:17 pm GMT
Top

Postby Muck » Thu Apr 10, 2008 12:42 pm GMT

I agree with bet size being a massive tell for on-line poker (and B&M for that matter) but I personally don’t assign much weight to timing tells.

Insta-actions are interesting but I rarely see people using them, apart from the fold one.

Sometime I see a player insta-limp but that’s usually when the guy in front takes his entire bar to decide to fold because he’s gone for a pee and the next guy decided he only needs to think if there’s a raise so just ticks the call bet option to keep things moving.

Other then that I don’t really understand them. I mean as you said it’s representing that “I know exactly what I want to do regardless of cards or other players actionsâ€
User avatar
Muck
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 12:19 pm GMT
Location: Newport on Styx
  • Website
Top

Postby Jauron » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:04 pm GMT

I think some timing tells are helpful but the above was a reverse tell, and we have no way of knowing if villain is paying attention or even playing one table, not to mention aware of what they could mean.

If they are not looking for tells, it's a wasted effort usually.
User avatar
Jauron
 
Posts: 2598
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:13 am GMT
Location: Living in your walls
  • YIM
Top

Postby gumbie » Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:34 pm GMT

Jauron wrote:I think some timing tells are helpful but the above was a reverse tell, and we have no way of knowing if villain is paying attention or even playing one table, not to mention aware of what they could mean.

If they are not looking for tells, it's a wasted effort usually.


Aha! You found MrD's biggest leak.

ie assuming villains are thinking as much as he is or even thinking at all.
User avatar
gumbie
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:17 pm GMT
Top

Postby Muck » Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:10 pm GMT

gumbie wrote:ie assuming villains are thinking as much as he is or even thinking at all.

Maybe he needs to practice on some mirco-limit tables :) It’s like trying to read a Chinese newspaper, through binoculars, that’s caught in a tornado...while also being blind :-D
User avatar
Muck
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 12:19 pm GMT
Location: Newport on Styx
  • Website
Top

Next

Post a reply
19 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

Return to Hand Analysis and Theory

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO
Copyright © 2013 Ace Nine, LLC
Legal  |  Contact Us  |  Site Map