Stupid lowball question
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Stupid lowball question
I saw someone explain how to quickly determine a winning hand in a lowball game (I've never really played a lowball game myself). Is it that you start with the highest value card and look at the cards like they are one number? Or do you start with the lowest?
Example:
hand #1 - 2 3 4 5 6 would be 65,432
hand #2 - A 3 4 5 7 would be 75,431
In that example, 2 3 4 5 6 would be the winning (lowest) hand. I would assume this is correct even though hand #2 contained a lower card than hand #1 (the A).
(Let's say you're playing draw lowball for the sake of my question)
Example:
hand #1 - 2 3 4 5 6 would be 65,432
hand #2 - A 3 4 5 7 would be 75,431
In that example, 2 3 4 5 6 would be the winning (lowest) hand. I would assume this is correct even though hand #2 contained a lower card than hand #1 (the A).
(Let's say you're playing draw lowball for the sake of my question)
-

TxShadow - Posts: 613
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 5:09 pm GMT
That confused me too at first. You start from the highest card.
To see which hand would win, it depends on the variation you play.
- "Deuce to Seven", the lowest possible hand is 23457, since 23456 is considered as a straight. (In your exemple, Hand #2 would win)
- "Ace to 5", A2345 is the lowest hand, the straights/flushes don't play against you in this variation. (In your exemple, Hand #1 would win)
To see which hand would win, it depends on the variation you play.
- "Deuce to Seven", the lowest possible hand is 23457, since 23456 is considered as a straight. (In your exemple, Hand #2 would win)
- "Ace to 5", A2345 is the lowest hand, the straights/flushes don't play against you in this variation. (In your exemple, Hand #1 would win)
-

cayouche - Posts: 810
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:02 am GMT
- Location: QC, Canada
I think A-5 low is more common than 2-7, especially with hi-low games, but I could be wrong.
Yeah, lowball is ranked like normal poker, then reversed. One way to remember this is that sometimes hands are only referred to by their highest card:
So in your example, hand #1 is "a six" and hand #2 is "a seven". That's why lots of hi-low games say "eights-or-better" (and sometimes "nines-or-better"). Meaning that the worst qualifying low hand is "an eight" or "a nine", respectively.
So the only time you really have to look any further than the first card is when two people have the same "hand" (two or more people with "a seven", for example).
Yeah, lowball is ranked like normal poker, then reversed. One way to remember this is that sometimes hands are only referred to by their highest card:
So in your example, hand #1 is "a six" and hand #2 is "a seven". That's why lots of hi-low games say "eights-or-better" (and sometimes "nines-or-better"). Meaning that the worst qualifying low hand is "an eight" or "a nine", respectively.
So the only time you really have to look any further than the first card is when two people have the same "hand" (two or more people with "a seven", for example).
-

galderon - Posts: 300
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:11 pm GMT
- Location: Milwaukee, WI
galderon wrote:I think A-5 low is more common than 2-7, especially with hi-low games, but I could be wrong.
Actually, 2-7 is much more popular in draw games (Triple Draw, Kansas City Lowball, etc.). But pretty much every stud/flop game I've come across, the A-5 variation is standard (although it's usually referred to as 8 or better; ace is low and flushes and straights don't count).
-

flafishy - Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 9:02 am GMT
- Location: Broward County, FL
It's a shame too: single draw A-5 is probably one of my favorite poker games out there. I almost played it once, too.
-

snoogins47 - Posts: 2358
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:31 pm GMT
- Location: He Could Be From Portugal
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Non-Holdem Poker Talk
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

