Was my stack to big/hand too weak for this move?

[jimmer]

The blinds were about to go up. There are still 44'ish players left and only 18 get paid.

Was this play unreasonable? What would you have done?

PokerStars Game #43608336911: Tournament #269437333, $4.00+$0.40 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2010/05/04 16:26:26 ET
Table '269437333 4' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: Freeway1988 (5415 in chips)
Seat 2: Brenda311 (1436 in chips)
Seat 3: sgerrard4 (4135 in chips)
Seat 4: Croato_BBB (3050 in chips)
Seat 5: sirgeo7 (3743 in chips)
Seat 6: jbdb3 (2728 in chips)
Seat 8: Stebelle (12976 in chips)
Seat 9: jcgb_81 (13060 in chips)
Freeway1988: posts small blind 100
Brenda311: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to jbdb3 [7c 7s]
sgerrard4: folds
Croato_BBB: folds
sirgeo7: folds
jbdb3: raises 2528 to 2728 and is all-in

[jeffonline]

This is how I see the situation. The big blind is a short stack and will act with a wide range. If we open, I would open all-in, pointless otherwise. The cut off will need a big hand to push and isolate you and the BB, he has to be concerned about the chip leader on the button. The button can call you all-in but then gives 2/1 odds to the SB and will not want to risk 5400 chips as the SB should either fold or push. I would have pushed. You need to start picking up chips.

EDIT: The SB will not act without a primum hand, the blinds aren’t that big and he is on the button next hand.

[golddog]

Seems totally reasonable to me. You're sitting there with 13 BB (soon to be 9), and still quite a way til the money (i.e., you can't fold one or two hands and get paid).

That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to find you get multi-way action. One or two of the big stacks, plus Brenda.