wow.. i got hoodwinked

[kingetje]

playing a forum reg from pokernews.nl forum HU for fun


i limped once earlier and he said "lol button limp".. so i decided to do it again here w JJ. thought maybe he'd try something..... boy did i get it



PokerStars Game #20141447808: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2008/09/04 13:11:00 ET
Table 'Hirayama' 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: kingetje ($157.90 in chips)
Seat 2: JdK87 ($51.35 in chips)
kingetje: posts small blind $0.25
JdK87: posts big blind $0.50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kingetje [Jd Js]
kingetje: calls $0.25
JdK87: checks
*** FLOP *** [Jh As Ah]
JdK87: checks
kingetje: bets $1
JdK87: calls $1
*** TURN *** [Jh As Ah] [4d]
JdK87: checks
kingetje: checks
*** RIVER *** [Jh As Ah 4d] [5c]
JdK87: bets $1.75
kingetje: raises $7.25 to $9
JdK87: raises $40.85 to $49.85 and is all-in
kingetje said, "OMG"
kingetje said, "A4 lol"
kingetje said, "you have A4 yes"
kingetje said, "A5"
kingetje: folds
Uncalled bet ($40.85) returned to JdK87
JdK87 collected $20.50 from pot
JdK87: shows [6c 9s] (a pair of Aces)
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $21 | Rake $0.50
Board [Jh As Ah 4d 5c]
Seat 1: kingetje (button) (small blind) folded on the River
Seat 2: JdK87 (big blind) collected ($20.50)

[miaowmiaowchowface]

real?

[kingetje]

sorry to say it is lol

[gumbie]

you don't play hu much do you :D

[Ensano]

this hand makes me want to throw up...

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

315 games 0.005 secs 63,000 games/sec

Board: Ac Ad Jh 5s 4d
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 85.714% 85.71% 00.00% 270 0.00 { JJ }
Hand 1: 14.286% 14.29% 00.00% 45 0.00 { QQ+, 55-44, A2s+, A2o+ }

i wish you and ciso lived somewhere close by so i could go smack you'se upside the head..

[kingetje]

Hand 1: 14.286% 14.29% 00.00% 45 0.00 { QQ+, 55-44, A2s+, A2o+ }

this range doesnt look very realistic

he is a reg who plays 200NL.


hes not reraising the river with a lone A for value.... and how are QQ+ in there? why would he shove QQ or KK? no raise preflop?

imo if hes shoving for value he has me beat, or its a bluff. and how often are 3bet shoves on the river bluffs? if it was some unknown i woulda insta called of course. though i overlooked 55 and 44 really, he could definitely valueshove those. but i doubt he checkcalls those on flop

[kingetje]

damn, if i raise preflop, theres no way i end up folding this.

[gumbie]

polarised hand ranges, bla bla bla

[tame_deuces]

You folded a boat HU?

Like I would have said to someone at a poker table telling me this story:

"That's...impressive."

[Phil14312]

Ummm, isn't this exactly what you wanted to have happen? Did you just have a finger-fart?

[Ciso_B]

To all those who pokerstove everything. I beleive it was Doyle who said "Good poker players play their cards (i.e. their opponent),and poor ones let the cards play them."


I remember him going on to say something like these same poor players are the ones that might say something like "I know im beat , I have 3 aces so I HAVE to call."

[supafrey]

To all those who pokerstove everything. I beleive it was Doyle who said "Good poker players play their cards (i.e. their opponent),and poor ones let the cards play them."


I remember him going on to say something like these same poor players are the ones that might say something like "I know im beat , I have 3 aces so I HAVE to call."

You really don't see the difference between pokerstoving effective ranges vs. not understanding relative hand strengths? Aren't they like.. opposites?

I understand sometimes you can be "100%" sure of a certain thing, making your read skew the % of time your opponent may have those specific hand combinations, but that just makes us adjust our pokerstove calcs, not scrap them all together. You're still figuring out ranges, not specific cards, you're just increasing the probability of a certain specific hand because of a physical tell, personal history, etc.

[UrAteUp]

sorry to say it is lol

I don't think I would be admitting this...lol. Say something like yeah but it was reversed...or nahhhh I just made it up to see if I could get UAU to say something stupid...

[crack]

To all those who pokerstove everything. I beleive it was Doyle who said "Good poker players play their cards (i.e. their opponent),and poor ones let the cards play them."


I remember him going on to say something like these same poor players are the ones that might say something like "I know im beat , I have 3 aces so I HAVE to call."

I would have felt sorry for the poor ones who played against Doyle and Chip with marked decks and bent dealers tbh.

[Ensano]

To all those who pokerstove everything. I beleive it was Doyle who said "Good poker players play their cards (i.e. their opponent),and poor ones let the cards play them."


I remember him going on to say something like these same poor players are the ones that might say something like "I know im beat , I have 3 aces so I HAVE to call."

really?....